August 9,
2004Articles and commentary regarding world
events
|
The
Karma of America
It is
only with the eye, and heart, and mind of God that Karma can be
weighed in order to determine what causes have elicited what
effects, and what place Grace or mercy shall play in the
evaluation of these causes. Karma is both an 'impersonal' force
within the Universe - the Law of Cause and Effect balancing what
goes out with what comes back. But it is also a force whose
operation is held within the mind and heart of God, and in this
sense alone it can be considered 'personal' as well.
What this means is that the out-picturing
of Karma can be affected by Grace, superceded by Grace, even
suspended by Grace, when an individual repays in full measure of
intensity their debt of energy to the universe. The origin of
this debt may have accrued over many lifetimes, yet, in the case of
negative Karma, when the moment is right, a sufficient amount of
recognition, feeling, remorse, accompanied by a crying out to God,
can, sometimes in the space of a moment, wipe the slate clean. The
love and mercy of God can forgive or lessen the consequences of what
would otherwise be an impersonal force through the Heart of God,
which is the Christ consciousness.
Bearing this in mind, we can
never say that there is a one-to-one correlation between an action
taken and an action returned. There is a correlation, but
very much depends upon the circumstances that led up to the action,
the intention held while carrying it out, and the healing of
consciousness within the individual or nation that may take place
following the action. Nevertheless, all actions, thoughts, and
emotional energies that emerge from our consciousness elicit Karma,
that is, the return of a similar energy to us in the course of
time.
We, as a nation, generate
Karma not only in the present, but from our past as
well.
We are accountable for
the actions of our pilgrims in relation to the native peoples they
encountered.
We are accountable
for the actions of our governments in relation to the land that was
taken from these peoples.
We
are accountable for the institution of slavery which formed part of
our historical foundation and for the legacy of racism which
remained even after slavery was abolished.
We are accountable for our
incursions into the territories of other countries that we sought to
impose our will upon, and for the lack of interest in still other
countries, both near and far, when they cried out to us for help.
All that we have done as a nation, past and present, generates our
national Karma.
While we are
accountable for harm that we have done to others, both past and
present, and for neglecting to act when it was needed, at the same
time we are also accountable for the goodness that we have
generated. For the fact
that:
Since our founding in
1776 we have held free elections - a tribute to democratic process
that has been stable for more than 200 years.
We have not overthrown our
duly constituted governments by violent
means.
We have striven to
respect the rights of individuals as defined by our constitution.
We have striven to uphold the
freedom of each of our citizens and to offer them due process of
law.
We have made efforts to
establish equality among diverse groups within a pluralistic
society, and,
We have welcomed
the poor and destitute from elsewhere within our borders so that
they could taste freedom and participate in the life of opportunity
that was and still continues to be offered here.
In the presence of whatever
mistakes we have made, and there have been many, we have continued
to uphold democracy and the ideals of liberty.
All this gets added up upon
the scales of Karma. It is weighed within the mind of God and we, as
a people, both government and governed, are held accountable. Of
course for us as individuals, national Karma is not the only source
of our individual Karma nor even the primary one, for there are many
things that our nation and our government has done that we, as
individuals, have had little or no say in. Nevertheless, national
Karma is part of the composite karmic picture for every individual
within every nation.
What does
all this mean for us, the United States of America, now that we
have, within the last century, participated in two World Wars,
created a bomb that had never before been seen, then used it in
Hiroshima and Nagasake, fought a war in Korea then one in Vietnam,
and are now fighting a 'war against terrorism' - a war that has no
boundaries either in time or space - a war that will continue for as
long as we deem it to be necessary.
What does it mean as we occupy
territories of other nations, theoretically to liberate them from
terrorism or from despotism, but in fact to preserve our own
national security and national self-interest? What does it mean,
that we are seen as imperialists, as 'occupiers' rather than
'liberators', as arrogant and superior in our ways of relating to
the Arab world, much of which has come to hate us?
What does it mean? It means
that we, as a people and as a nation must wake up to our
responsibility - to find a means of relating to the life of the
world other than by being the greatest 'superpower' of all time.
Our identity as 'superpower'
must transform itself into an identity as advocate for the welfare
of all.
Our isolationism must
transform itself into a globalism which would prompt those in
positions of decision-making to allow our share of the world's
wealth and resources, inequitably distributed at present, to be
shared with all.
Our
protectionism of self in the sense of 'national self-interest' must
be replaced by a desire to protect the physical earth which we all
share, and,
Our
self-righteousness and moral superiority in relation to other
cultures that we don't understand must be transformed into a
willingness to accord dignity and respect to all who are different
from us.
It is only through the
transformation of our consciousness that the national Karma we have
acquired can ultimately be mitigated and transformed. There are
many, many good things that we, as the United States of America,
have done, not just for ourselves, but for all people. Yet, there
are also many things that we have left undone, that we have given
only lip-service to doing, that have caused the world and the
peoples of the world to be treated indifferently at best, and
harmed, at worst.
It is time
for us to become accountable. Our very existence as a free and
virtuous nation, founded on the highest ideals of mankind, is at
stake. As individuals and as a nation, it is time for us to become
accountable not only for our actions, but for our consciousness
which gives rise to these actions. We each may feel very small in
our capacity to influence those who govern in our name, but we are
in fact large. If our consciousness demands truth, then our
leaders will become more truthful. If our consciousness requires
selflessness and we each start thinking selflessly, then our
governing officials will have a new directive guiding them. And if
having more becomes less important so that others may thrive,
then the foundations of much of what drives us today, economically
and politically, will change.
We can change the Karma of a
nation by changing ourselves and our consciousness. Only in this way
will those who govern, ultimately become accountable to the fact
that we share one Earth and that we are one
people.
In
Pursuit of Truth: Afghanistan
"Bush sorry medical group left
Afghanistan." (Aug. 3, 2004) http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Bush-Afghanistan.html
A sad commentary and follow-up regarding the group,
Medicins Sans Frontieres, which is leaving Afghanistan after 24
years of working there. MSF's stated reasons are in the article as
are the President's comments. "All the Pretty Words." NY
Times (Aug. 2, 2004) http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/02/opinion/02herbert.html
An op-ed piece by Bob Herbert regarding the difference
between 'truth' on the campaign trail and within political
officialdom, and the practical realities of life. Herbert writes:
"Unfortunately, we've become a society addicted to the fantasy of a
quick fix. We want our solutions encompassed in a sound bite. We
want our leaders to manipulate reality to our
liking." This article is not
about Afghanistan but includes it in the list of media-enforced
images which enter the public domain that depart from what ground
observers know to be true. "MSF pulls out of
Afghanistan." (July 28, 2004) http://www.msf.org/countries/page.cfm?articleid=8851DF09-F62D-47D4-A8D3EB1E876A1E0DA
moving testimony to this group's long dedication to the cause of
humanitarian service and its present view on why this is no longer
possible. Other articles of
interest:"Deepening Anti-U.S. Rage Casts Doubt on Iraq
Leaders' Ability to Restore Order." (Aug. 7, 2004) http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0807-04.htmAnalysis:
Interpreting Islam. (July 9, 2004) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3880151.stm"Evicted
from camp, Sudan refugees suffer in limbo." (Aug. 3, 2004) http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/03/international/africa/03darf.html
In
Pursuit of Truth: Hidden Agendas
Elected
officials, governments, corporate leaders, candidates, national and
international non-governmental agencies, can have goals and plans to
reach these goals that are not made public. These plans are not
necessarily 'secret'. They may just be private, in the sense that we
all have private things that only those we choose to share them with
will know. These private things become 'hidden agendas' when the
stated goal or cultivated image of an official, government,
corporation, or agency is put forth within the public domain in
order to cover-up or conceal other plans or aims that the public
would either disapprove of or seek to prevent, if known.
Subterfuge and
deception are practices that are deliberate. They include
misrepresenting known facts, hiding documents from exposure,
concealing intentions to break the law - either national or
international, and most especially, using a public display of
partial truth - that is, a plan which represents a portion of
what is genuinely operating as motive - in order to cover up a more
basic truth that would not be
palatable. To know that
individuals, agencies, governments, and groups can have hidden
agendas, can prompt us to become more discerning regarding truth and
truthfulness. Disillusionment, which often leads to despair, anger,
or withdrawal in the presence of dishonesty from those in positions
of power or leadership, is not of value here. It is not
constructive. What is of value is the growing ability of each
of us to tell, moment to moment, speech to speech, situation to
situation, who is speaking with greater truth and who with lesser.
Our capacity for discernment
must grow by listening. But listening is not enough. We must also
pray for clarity and light to enter our awareness so that we can
hear clearly. It is not enough to hear with our own ears. We must
hear with the ears of our soul and with the ears of the spiritual
realms and God. Without the alignment of prayer to perceive truth,
we become involved with opinion and are susceptible to the
distortions that our personalities impose on our view of events.
With alignment with light and God, we grow in our capacity to
distinguish truth from falsehood and light from darkness. This has
always been important, but it is especially important now that the
stakes are so high for our safety in this country and for the safety
of the world. We need to know, as best we can, what is operating
behind the scenes in our movement into Afghanistan, into Iraq, with
the Saudis, with Israel, and of course domestically, just to name a
few critical areas. These are powerful involvements, and they
require of us an equally strong intention to see clearly so that we
can know more - not from the media, but from within ourselves, about
what is going on. In
this context, here is an example of 'truth' questioned by former
presidential-hopeful Howard Dean during a recent CNN interview, http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0804-10.htm>httpAnd
another article giving voice to the widespread uncertainty regarding
this same subject - the raised terrorist alert. (Aug. 5, 2004) http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/05/politics/05react.html?hp< In
a similar vein, the following article concerns itself with U.S.
involvement during the first Gulf War in Iraq - Operation Desert
Storm: The Lies We Are Told About Iraq. (Jan. 5, 2003) http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0105-02.htm
There are many other writings and
opinions concerning U.S. motives for military engagement in Iraq,
Afghanistan, Bosnia, and elsewhere, that speak to the hidden side of
world events. Some are more informational; some more angry; some
seem bent on just being oppositional. Here, as everywhere, the need
to pursue truth is our only defense against falsehood and
misrepresentation. This pursuit, combined with alignment with
light and God, is necessary in order that we remain steadfast in
relation to purity in the midst of all that would obscure it.
Israel plans settlement expansion in the West
Bank. Related to the
everpresent need to examine motives and motivation, a situation of
great importance and potential consequence is presently being
generated by Israel's decision to pursue the building of new homes
within the West Bank. What makes the situation ambiguous, is that
the stakes are so high in terms of the increased enmity that such an
action arouses - not only among Arab countries but in world opinion
as well - that it is difficult to see how this course can continue
to be pursued. It should also be noted that Israel's present stance
contradicts its former commitment to pursue the goals of the
'roadmap to peace' which included not building more settlements in
occupied areas. "Israel Confiscates Thousands of Acres of
Settlement Land to Build Israeli Wall" (June 14, 2004) http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0614-10.htm"Israeli
Settlements Control Nearly Half of West Bank" (May 14, 2002) http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0514-04.htmShould
Israel end settlement activities? (BBC online readers speak out): http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3531396.stm
To subscribe click link below
|
| |