Sept. 20, 2004Articles and commentary regarding world events
The 'State of Exception'

     "The 'state of exception' or state of emergency, often also called martial law, is the right of the sovereign ... to suspend the law, fully or in part, in a case where the state (and the law) is in danger...  A state of exception lies at the core of sovereignty. It is not the power to make the law, but the power to suspend it..."(italics mine)   In the article below, Belgian philosopher Lieven De Cauter discusses his theories about the 'state of exception' in the context of the Bush administration's 'war on terror'. Though his discussion is strongly worded and contains definitions that some might not agree with, especially in relation to comparisons between U.S. policy in Guantanamo and the third reich, De Cauter's central argument creates an important frame around a consciousness that appears to be true of the U.S. presently and of other countries as well. It is one that we increasingly need to be aware of.

"Seeking method in the madness of Abu Ghraib." (Sept. 11, 2004)

The following links also relate to De Cauter's discussion:

First, to the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo (ACLU: Sept. 15, 2004)

Federal Court Orders Government to Release or Identify All Documents Related to Abuse of Detainees in U.S. Custody by October 15.

     Second, to developments in Russia along parallel lines to the U.S. Though the movement toward a 'state of exception' in Russia was not included in De Cauter's discussion, recent events highlight this progression following President Putin's reorganization of government structure and electoral policy in the wake of the Beslan tragedy.

     The movement in Russia is important not only because of Russia's policy in relation to the Caucasus, but because the concentration of power "vertically" in Russia allows for potential future conflict between Russia and the U.S. related to world terrorism.

"Putin Tightens Grip on Security." (Sept. 13, 2004)

"Opponents Call Putin's Overhaul Plan a Step Back." (Sept. 14, 2004)
(NY Times articles are free of charge for 7 days post-publication).

"Yeltsin fears for Russia freedoms." (Sept. 16, 2004)

"Vladimir Putin: Russia's "khozayin."

     Third, in relation to Israel, where 'exceptions' to following international law have been, and continue to be, justified based on national security needs. The following two examples relate to policies that have stirred objection not only among Palestinians, but within the international community as well:

"Sharon Pledges Arafat Expulsion." (Sept. 14, 2004)

"Consider Geneva pact, Israel told." (Aug. 24, 2004)

......Though on the surface all of the above appear to be 'political' issues, that is, issues of government and policy, they are, beneath this surface, issues of energy and of consciousness - the consciousness that leads to a 'state of exception'.

Unity of Nations

     Alternatives to 'unilateralism' may be described as 'multilateralism' or 'internationalism', both of which stress collaboration among nations. Because the trend today in the U.S is so much in the opposite direction, it is important to keep in mind that there is, or could be, an alternative to the 'state of exception' way of maintaining national security.

     Emerging planetary consciousness - the sense of being one people sharing the same Divine essence and goals - is the single most important development that could give rise to a genuine 'internationalism' and therefore to an external organ or world body that would have some authority. (See LO Archive, Sept. 6th: World Council of Nations: A Planetary Perspective). Clearly, this has not happened yet, for the United Nations, despite its high principles and noble intentions, has been limited by history - the history of consciousness that emphasizes national self-interest at the expense of others. Also, the history of greed and indifference which has not yet allowed us, collectively, to take responsibility for sharing the earth's resources, for maintaining the earth's eco-system, or for providing for the health of all.

     With respect to treaties, plans, and commitments, there is still a great distance to go. Yet, even in the present, it is useful for us to know what world bodies such as the United Nations and the International Court of Justice have as founding principles, and what their functions are meant to be. These bodies are intended to provide the foundation, even now, for international law and justice. Because adherence to their principles is largely voluntary, and because the trend in the U.S., especially, is away from multilateralism, the United Nations has been limited in what it can and has been allowed to do.

     A 'World Council of Nations' could, in the future, come into existence because its representative function - to speak for the good of the planet as a whole - would not be in dispute. There would be a legitimate field such as international law which could regulate conflict, because there would also be a polity (that is, a people, an entity) who would be the 'people of the world', corresponding to the word 'inter-national'. Though the U.N. has never been legitimized or fully empowered in this way, in principle, its Charter stands as an inspiring document, a document of hope suggesting the possibility of more to come when we are ready.

Charter of the United Nations.

Reading the Preamble and Chptrs. I, V, and VII as a foundation can convey possibilities that such a world body might have if it were endowed with legitimate authority, especially at times of crises.

International Court of Justice.

The International Court of Justice has had a limited, but in certain instances, very important role to play in history. Its most famous cases are probably known to many of us. To see the scope of issues currently being dealt with by the Court, look at the "Press releases of pending cases" section under "What's New at the ICJ"

Current U.N. issues being addressed:

"Iraq war illegal, says Annan." (Sept. 16, 2004)

Kofi Annan refers here to the U.N. Charter and its principles regarding non-intervention into the territory of a sovereign nation. (Article 2, Principle 4, and Article 39).

"UN threatens sanctions on Sudan." (Sept. 19, 2004)

The 'Personal' and the 'Global'

     It is easy to feel that with so much going on today, both on the world stage and in the realm of the 'personal', that it is hard to know where to put our attention. Deeply held values of a spiritual kind influence this choice and define our involvement with the fate of people everywhere. Yet, for many of us, despite our caring and despite our desire for a broader outlook, we live our lives within a small sphere of perception, often trying to minimize the influence of dramatic world events upon our everyday consciousness, just so that we can get by.

     Nevertheless, we can ask if it is really possible at this time to have a 'personal' life - one that is not influenced by the 'global'? Perhaps for some, though America's state of 'war' and the threat of imminent terrorist activity makes this unlikely for most. We can try to redirect our focus away from world events so that we feel separate. But are we really separate, or just choosing to be unaware of the looming difficulties that are writ large on the world scene?

     To consider the question of what is 'personal' and what is 'global', what is 'in here' and what is 'out there', is to reflect on the subject of identity - to scrutinize who we perceive ourselves to be and what we hold to be most important to us in terms of values. In doing this, it may be useful to ask ourselves: What, among the many things that we are aware of during a given day, do we feel is most important for us to pay attention to? The answer to this forms the shape of our identity, not our deepest identity which is of the soul and spirit, but our conscious experience of ourselves.

     Our sense of identity changes and matures through time and history, changing the view we have regarding our 'self'. As part of this movement, spiritual identification with the common lot of mankind naturally develops, creating an understanding of the oneness of life and the unity of souls. Such perception, over time, comes to be held less as idea or belief, than as experienced reality, not needing to be proven, but given. Today, we are each somewhere along the path of growth and learning regarding the relationship between self and others. Yet fear can cloud our willingness to identify with others, especially with their suffering - fear of being overwhelmed by too much feeling, fear of helplessness in relation to all that needs to be done to help - fear that there isn't enough of us (meaning, enough of love) to be shared with so large a group as the 'human family'.

     Despite our fear and in the presence of it, we are called, today, to become larger, not only in our thinking, but in our feeling. Not only in our caring, but in our capacity to hold suffering and pain as well. Indeed, we each have the capacity to 'become larger' because it is part of who we are as souls - we are each 'larger' than we believe ourselves to be. If we have become disillusioned with the world and have sought to separate from it, it is time, now, for us to reexamine the premises for hope - premises that our soul holds for us as part of our own inner nature. We do this, knowing that we cannot help anyone, including ourselves, if we do not have hope. We do it also because our hearts tell us that hope is needed if the world is to heal.

     Helplessness and hopelessness are not the same thing. Helplessness is a state of frozen action or feeling. It is related to an inability to directly alter a situation that we would wish to alter, whether personal or global. Hopelessness, by contrast, involves a belief that the situation can never be altered. It links to our own helplessness, God's presumed helplessness or absence, and affirms that things will not get better, they will only get worse.

     In order to maintain hope, we need to distinguish between the perception of helplessness and the perception of hopelessness and to examine them with care. Though corrective physical action may not be possible for us right now in many of the troubling world situations we hear about daily, spiritual action in the way of prayer and alignment with light is always possible. It is always possible through heart, mind, and alignment with God, to link our consciousness with others and in this way to convey hope. For the rest, for the situation to change on the outer level as well, we must learn to wait in trust.

     If we perceive obstacles within ourselves to the striving for unity with others anywhere, everywhere - including those whom we dislike who may be our immediate peers and neighbors - we can choose to make of this a spiritual practice so that greater unity becomes possible. This spiritual practice focuses attention and energy in the direction of our heart's caring and in the direction of our desire for healing. In practice, we ask that Divine light and love move through us on all levels so that the world may be helped and healed by our being here. To engage with this kind of practice requires an absence of exclusion, for all exclusiveness limits the ability of the heart to grow in love. It also requires that we look reality full in the face - that we see what's happening 'out there' and question what the relationship is between 'out there' and what is within us.

     Greater consciousness will not make us weaker, it will make us stronger. It will not interfere with 'our' life more than the fearful prospect of hidden things that we don't want to face. For denial does not prevent our consciousness from being aware of something. It only prevents our consciousness from being aware of the content of something. The underlying sense of needing to avoid it, the fear involved, remains, often more potently than what would arise if we were to face what we would rather not face.

     At this time of great human distress and fear in so many places - Israel, Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, Russia and also within the United States, let us bear witness to the suffering of humanity wherever and however it touches our hearts. For 'they' are 'us', and 'their' pain has a direct effect on the life of the world.

* * * * *

The World:

Czechen rebel claims Beslan siege. (Sept. 17, 2004)

"Iraq: Signs of Desperation." (Sept. 14, 2004)

"Bloodshed in U.S. raids in Falluja." (Sept. 17, 2004)

"Iraqi carbomb kills 23 in Kirkuk." (Sept. 18, 2004)

"Israel raids kill 10 Palestinians." (Sept. 15, 2004)

"U.N.: Up to 10,000 dying a month in Darfur camps." (Sept. 13, 2004)

"Ivan whips US with tornadoes." (Sept. 17, 2004)

To view back issues:
To subscribe, click link below

The purpose of Light Omega is to bring us all into greater planetary consciousness with awareness of the suffering of others and with a willingness to remain awake to the challenges, dangers, and possibilities we face today.

     Julie Redstone

"Greater consciousness will not make us weaker, it will make us stronger."